There are two situations:
In the first case, the frozen amount is small, and the settlement is directly chosen without responding to the lawsuit.
In the second case, the frozen amount is large, and there are two aspects:
(1) The frozen amount is large, but there is no way to persist for one to two months. Mai Jia supports the proposal to choose the settlement channel, just because the settlement is volatile and the time is uncontrollable, and the compensation settlement fund will be higher than the cost of responding to the lawsuit, and the total expenditure may be higher than the way of responding to the lawsuit first and then settling.
(2) The frozen amount is large, and it can last for one to two months. Mai Jia supports that the plaintiff’s law firm can be suppressed by responding to the lawsuit, and the total cost may be lower than that of direct settlement.
WhatApp:+86 156 8077 8360
WeChat search follows the public platform "麦家支持":
● Input the US case number to real-time query the case filing time/latest progress
● Check if the case is in default judgment (important)
● Investigate the settlement/response/withdrawal of other defendants and sellers in the case in the United States
If reprinted, please indicate the source: https://www.sellertro.com/archives/32314
